I installed Firefox and I may never use anything else.
I’m in geek heaven.
I installed Firefox and I may never use anything else.
I’m in geek heaven.
Government contractors are under the impression that lawmakers in the U.S. watch local TV and read The Washington Post; they must be otherwise, what is the point of running ads that try to create a feel good image about a company in a market with no voting representation in Congress?
I was watching the local news Friday (I like Channel 9 probably because it’s what my grandmother watched but also, I think, because they are not prone to sweeps month stunts) and during the broadcast there was a commercial from Halliburton which has recently come under attack for, among other things, under-delivering on contracts and over-pricing gasoline it is selling to the U.S. Armed Forces in Iraq. This :60 spot was a miracle of modern spin designed to burnish Halliburton’s image as a company that goes in and does the tough work while still having a heart.
Middle-aged white guy, dressed in khakis and an open-necked casual shirt, sits on a balcony or deck and speaks directly to the camera about how he knew he would face some tough challenges when he took the job with Halliburton nearly 10 years ago.
Cut to:
Footage of oil drill fires in Kuwait as white guy talks about the company “putting out some fires”
Cut to:
Footage of blowing sand and vehicles as white guy talks about the company “having a bit of a tough time with supply lines”
Cut to:
Footage of soldiers in desert BDUs lining up for chow with a sign in the background that says ‘Tuesday is Cheeseburger Night!’ as white guy intones: “but the best thing of all has been serving our troops overseas good old American food.”
Cut back to white guy still sitting in the chair on the balcony or deck as he gets ‘choked up’ about how that is the best thing they do.
OK, this guy is a horrible actor. He must be a real middle-manager at Halliburton because if he’s not, someone should burn his SAG card.
The more important question this raises in my mind, though, is: why is are U.S. armed forces contracting out to a private company to do a job the quartermaster corps has been doing for nearly 150 years? Last time I checked all branches of the military had not only their own supply methods but also their own cooks, so what are we doing paying a private contractor for this? Sad, really, that we can’t even feed our own troops any more. Perhaps until we can, we ought to leave them at home.
And another random thought, completely unrelated to the above: who decides when something is “collectible?” Are they the same people who decided that “green is the new black?”
Once you get past the bottom two strata on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs it becomes the little things that bring you joy. What do I mean by “the little things?”
How about:
The little joys.
So, if it’s possible, as they say, to nickel and dime yourself into the poorhouse, is it possible to little joy yourself happy?
We are living the ancient Chinese curse these days. With so much going on — the upcoming Presidential election, war in Iraq, the ‘war on terror,” gay and lesbian marriage in San Francisco and New Mexico, the President supporting an amendment to the Constitution on the issue, the economy idling for the third year in a row, — these are, indeed, interesting times. You can practically smell the history in the air. People with activist tendencies are beside themselves trying to find a way to be part of it all. Rather what being in Chicago in 1968 or at Kent State in 1970 felt like I would imagine.
Personally, these are very interesting times for me as well. I think I’m having my mid-life crisis early (at least, I hope it’s early). I’m spending a lot of time these days thinking about how I live my life, what’s right vs what I want (often the two are not the same), how to cope with the fact that the populace is largely hard of thinking these days (add that on top of the 80/80 rule (80% of the people in the world don’t think 80% of the time) and no wonder things are a mess), and what it means to be happy.
The Declaration of Independence states:
WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Our Founding Fathers didn’t bother to define happiness for us even though it is the state of being for which we all strive. Maybe it’s just because I’m prone to depression (I recently scored a 56 on the Goldberg Depression Quiz) that I think about what it means to be happy so much. After all, my friends who would describe themselves as happy don’t spend a lot of time thinking about it. But what defines happiness?
Is happiness the time-limited enjoyment of a particular event, say a concert or a movie? Is happiness that sense of elation you get from new love? Is happiness that feeling of satisfaction you get from finally nailing whatever it is you’ve been trying to do for so long (make 10 free-throws in a row, start your chain saw, finish writing a novel, get the closet organized)? Or is happiness really just an overblown name for contentment (you know, that sort of base level, ‘everything is OK and yeah there are some things I want I don’t have but pretty much it’s all good’ feeling)?
American culture tells us that happiness is stuff, oh, and being thin. Yes, in America, happiness is being hip, and cool, and thin, and having a lot of stuff. But not just any stuff, the specific stuff that will tell others that you are hip and cool. I think American culture is, to put it mildly, way off base on this one.
I think one of the keys to happiness lies inside the dot com concept of the “transforming transaction.” I first ran across this idea in a book I’m reading called There Must Be A Pony In Here Somewhere: The AOL Time Warner Debacle and The Quest for the Digital Future by Kara Swisher (get it at Amazon.com). Swisher talks about Jerry Levin, CEO of Time Warner, and Levin’s belief in the “transforming transaction” as a way to move business forward; one such transaction was the deal that got HBO satellite time in the 1970s allowing its parent company to establish it as a national service. Levin also believed that the merger with AOL would be another of these events.
I think where the dot com-ers got it all wrong is believing the transforming transaction has to be something huge. It can be something huge, like getting a new job or getting married, or it can be something small, like learning that someone you respect for whom you are not a natural peer considers you to be a peer. It can be the small, unexpected moment of realization about some fundamental bit of human nature, or it can be something gigantic like the city of San Francisco taking on not only the state of California but the Federal government by treating everyone equally.
It can simply be opening your eyes to realize you have no idea how you got where you are in your life.
So, in the pursuit of happiness, while it may be a little late for these, my resolutions for this year:
Ironic, really, that all this thought about happiness ripens on Mardi Gras, the last day before Lent. Who says the universe doesn’t have a sense of humor?
Just another dispatch from the Thoughts That Come Unbidden Department.
Sometimes, we’re too busy concentrating on the door that’s opened for us that we don’t notice the one that’s about to slam shut, and when it does, we’re completely unprepared.